Panel spend dashboard
Where the panel budget went, which firms carried it, and how long allocation took. This is the reporting obligation the platform is bought for.
Spend by panel firm
Data table
Spend by matter type
Data table
Monthly spend trend
Data table
Allocate a matter
The moment the dashboard becomes a marketplace. Describe the matter, and the engine ranks the panel on past performance, current capacity, rate against benchmark, and conflict status. It recommends; you decide.
Expect the ranking to disagree with your spend history. The FY26 allocations on the dashboard were made from memory and a spreadsheet, before any of this evidence existed — the firms carrying the most work are now the most stretched, and the firms rated highest are not the ones being called. That gap is the product.
Recent allocations
FY27 to dateEvery allocation made through PanelFlow, with the score the engine gave the chosen firm. Select a row for the full record.
Cross-agency rate benchmarks
What your panel charges, next to what the same seniority costs everywhere else. This is the knowledge the allocation flow creates and nobody else holds.
Your blended rate vs cross-agency median
Data table
Rate benchmarks by matter type and seniority
Positive delta means this agency pays above the cross-agency median. Select a row for the detail.
Why you win and lose
Win rate by matter type
Data table
Allocation share trend
Data table
Responsiveness
How quickly you answer an allocation request, against the panel average. Service is not your problem.
Where you lost — your rate vs the winning rate
Every matter you were shortlisted for and did not win. Select a row to see the full field.
About this play
The second-order idea this demo exists to show.